PEER  REVIEW PROCESS :

Manuscripts submitted to the Veterinary Biomedical and Clinical Journal undergo an initial review by the editor, followed by an independent evaluation by two (2) or more reviewers. The review process employs a double-blind method, ensuring the anonymity of both authors and reviewers. The decisions made by the reviewers hold significant weight in the editorial decision-making process. Reviewers are typically given two (2) weeks to complete a round of reviews. The candidates of reviewers are selected based on their expertise and reputation in the relevant field. After the candidate reviewer is informed their availabilities for reviewing process, the editor create account for each reviewer and then send manuscript by OJS. All reviewing processes are in blind peer review and managed by section editor in the OJS (Open Journal System). The final decision on whether a manuscript is accepted, revised, or rejected is determined by the reviewers’ reports and recommendations.

Based on the reviewers' recommendations, the editor may render one of the following four decisions:

Accept Submission: The manuscript will be accepted without requiring any revisions.
Revisions Required: The manuscript will be accepted after minor revisions are made.
Resubmit for Review: The manuscript requires substantial revisions and must undergo another round of review before it can be considered for acceptance.
Decline Submission: The manuscript will not be published in the journal.